In recent years, there have been several high-profile data breaches involving Google, one of the largest tech companies in the world. These breaches have raised serious concerns about the security of personal information and the potential dangers of using online services.
One of the most notable data breaches involving Google was the exposure of personal data of hundreds of thousands of Google+ users in 2018. The breach was caused by a software vulnerability, which allowed third-party developers to access sensitive information such as name, email address, occupation, and gender.
Cryptocurrency has taken the world by storm and Bitcoin is one of the most widely used virtual currencies. Despite its growing popularity, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced several data breaches, which have raised concerns about the security of digital currencies. In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most significant Bitcoin data breaches and the impact they have had on the cryptocurrency market.
Mt. Gox Mt. Gox was one of the largest Bitcoin exchanges in the world, handling over 70% of all Bitcoin transactions at its peak.
In 2013, Yahoo experienced one of the largest data breaches in history, resulting in the personal information of over 3 billion users being exposed. This breach was a major wake-up call for users about the dangers of sharing personal information online and the importance of online privacy.
The Yahoo data breach was caused by a state-sponsored hacker who gained access to the company’s systems and stole sensitive information such as names, email addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, and security questions and answers.
In the world of technology, data breaches are becoming more and more common. From large corporations to small businesses, no one is safe from the prying eyes of cybercriminals. In this article, we’ll take a wild ride through some of the most famous data breaches of all time and see just how much information was stolen. Buckle up and let’s get started!
Yahoo (2013) - This massive breach affected all 3 billion of Yahoo’s user accounts.
OpenSSL and BoringSSL are two of the most widely used cryptography libraries in the world, both providing essential encryption and secure communication services to millions of websites, applications, and devices. While both libraries are widely trusted, they differ in important ways when it comes to security and performance. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the two libraries and compare them in terms of vulnerabilities, performance, and source code.
The most famous OpenSSL vulnerabilities OpenSSL is a widely used open-source cryptography library that provides secure communication for many websites and applications. Despite its widespread use, OpenSSL has suffered from a number of critical vulnerabilities over the years, exposing sensitive information and putting the security of millions of users at risk. In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most famous OpenSSL vulnerabilities.
Heartbleed (2014) - One of the most famous OpenSSL vulnerabilities of all time, Heartbleed allowed attackers to steal sensitive information, including passwords and encryption keys, from memory.
The most famous BoringSSL vulnerabilities BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL, created by Google, that aims to provide a more secure and performant cryptography library. Despite its focus on security, BoringSSL has suffered from a number of critical vulnerabilities over the years, exposing sensitive information and putting the security of millions of users at risk. In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most famous BoringSSL vulnerabilities.
WhatsApp is a popular cross-platform instant messaging app that has over two billion monthly active users. It is known for its end-to-end encryption, which promises to protect the privacy of users’ messages and calls. However, the security of WhatsApp has been called into question after several data breaches have been reported in recent years.
One of the most significant data breaches involving WhatsApp occurred in May 2019, when it was revealed that spyware was used to infiltrate the phones of human rights activists and journalists.
Apple is known for its strong commitment to privacy and security, with the company often highlighting these features as a selling point for its products. Despite this reputation, there have been several high-profile data breaches involving Apple over the years. In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most well-known data breaches affecting Apple, what information was leaked, and what you can do to protect your privacy.
Server Name Indication (SNI) is a feature in the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol that enables a client to send the hostname of the website it wants to connect to before starting the SSL/TLS negotiation. This information is used by the server to determine which certificate to present to the client, allowing multiple websites to share the same IP address and still maintain secure, encrypted connections.
However, before the advent of encrypted SNI, this information was sent in plain text, making it vulnerable to snooping and tampering.
OAuth and OpenID are two popular authentication protocols that are widely used for authorization and authentication purposes. Both protocols allow users to securely sign in to a website or application without revealing their passwords. However, they have different purposes and uses, and it’s essential to understand the key differences between the two. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at OAuth and OpenID and compare them in detail.
Authorization or Authentication OAuth (Open Authorization) is an authorization protocol that enables third-party applications to access user data without revealing their passwords.
Zero Trust Architecture in Microsoft By 2020, Microsoft identified four core scenarios to achieve zero trust. These scenarios satisfy the requirements for strong identity, enrollment in device management, and device health validation. It also made way for alternative access for un-managed devices and validation for application health.
The initial scope for implementing zero trust focused on common corporate services used in the Microsoft enterprise by information workers, employees, partners, and vendors.
Introduction To gain access to enterprise resources, the traditional solution architecture is use VPN. For today’s cloud services, there is also zero trust architecture.
If you have on-premises resources, using a traditional VPN-based remote access architecture is one way of balancing remote usability with the risk of compromise.
If you have few or no on-premises services, the VPN may not required, the zero trust architecture can be very effective.
If you are designing a new network, consider following the zero trust network approach instead.
GDPR and CCPA Introduction The EU General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) (GDPR) took effect on May 25, 2018 and replaced the EU Directive and its member state implementing laws.
On June 28, 2018, California became the first U.S. state with a comprehensive consumer privacy law when it enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), which becomes effective January 1, 2020, with some exceptions (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.
There are 12 principles for securing devices from The EUD Security Framework 1, published in 2013, all of which must be considered when deploying a particular solution. These principles provide the basis for guidance for securing devices.
Data-in-transit protection Data should be protected as it transits from the end user device to any services the end user device uses. IPsec VPNs provide the most standards-compliant way of doing this, but TLS VPNs or per-app TLS connections can also be used.
CCPA Introduction California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), which becomes effective January 1, 2020, with some exceptions (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.100-1798.199). Given their comprehensiveness and broad reaches, each law may have significant impact on entities that collect and process personal data.
The CCPA grants California resident’s new rights regarding their personal information and imposes various data protection duties on certain entities conducting business in California. While it incorporates several GDPR concepts, such as the rights of access, portability, and data deletion, there are several areas where the CCPA requirements are more specific than those of the GDPR or where the GDPR goes beyond the CCPA requirements.
What Is the GDPR? The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a major law established in 2018 by the European Union (EU) to protect personal data. The law in the European Economic Area (EEA)—that’s the EU plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway—recognizes data protection as a fundamental right. The GDPR is the most comprehensive data protection law in the world, and it applies to every company that is based in the EEA and/or offers its goods or services to or monitors the behavior of individuals in the EEA.
Right To Non-Discrimination Per California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Businesses cannot deny goods or services, charge you a different price, or provide a different level or quality of goods or services just because you exercised your rights under the CCPA.
However, if you refuse to provide your personal information to a business or ask it to delete or stop selling your personal information, and that personal information or sale is necessary for the business to provide you with goods or services, the business may not be able to complete that transaction.
Introduction What Is Privacy by Design? Today, privacy is not only an ethical imperative, but also a basic human right. And Privacy by Design is a way of reinforcing that human right.
Privacy by Design is the concept of building privacy into everything we do. In our interconnected world, where personal information is shared freely, privacy is more important than ever.
Inherent in the concept of Privacy by Design is the feature of Privacy by Default, which means that the strictest privacy settings should apply by default to business activities and processes, without any action required from the end user.
Everything you should know about End-to-end encryption.
What is End-to-end encryption End-to-end encryption (E2EE) is a system of communication where only the communicating users can read the messages. In principle, it prevents potential eavesdroppers – including telecom providers, Internet providers, and even the provider of the communication service – from being able to access the cryptographic keys needed to decrypt the conversation.
In many messaging systems, including email and many chat networks, messages pass through intermediaries and are stored by a third party, from which they are retrieved by the recipient.
