A Comparison of End to End Encrypted Messaging Apps

 

Page content

What is End to End Encrypted Messaging Apps

End-to-end encrypted messaging apps are a category of communication platforms that employ advanced encryption techniques to ensure the privacy and security of messages exchanged between users. Unlike traditional messaging services, where messages might be stored and processed on the service provider’s servers, end-to-end encryption ensures that only the sender and intended recipient can access the content of the messages.

In this system, messages are encrypted on the sender’s device and remain encrypted as they traverse the communication channel until they are decrypted on the recipient’s device. This encryption scheme prevents anyone, including service providers and hackers, from intercepting and deciphering the messages in transit.

End-to-end encryption involves the use of encryption keys, with each user having a public key and a private key. The public key is used to encrypt messages, while the private key, which is only accessible to the user, is used to decrypt them. This ensures that even if the communication channel is compromised, the encrypted messages remain indecipherable without the private key held by the recipient.

While end-to-end encryption provides strong protection for user privacy, it has also sparked debates about its potential misuse by malicious actors. Law enforcement agencies, for instance, may encounter challenges in accessing encrypted communications during criminal investigations, raising concerns about the balance between privacy and security.

End-to-end encrypted messaging apps offer a heightened level of privacy and security for users, but they also present complex societal and legal considerations that require careful navigation.

End-to-end encrypted messaging apps have revolutionized the way we communicate in the digital age. These platforms prioritize user privacy by ensuring that only the intended sender and recipient can access the content of their messages. This level of encryption provides a strong shield against unauthorized access, bolstering individuals’ confidence in the security of their online conversations. However, this technological advancement also raises complex legal questions, particularly regarding law enforcement’s ability to access these encrypted communications for purposes of national security and criminal investigations. In this context, it becomes essential to understand the nuances of how different messaging apps handle content and metadata accessibility, while striving to strike a balance between user privacy and broader societal interests.

A Comparison of End to End Encrypted Messaging Apps

Threema

Threema is a completely independent and fully self-financed Swiss company based in the Zürich metropolitan area.

  • End-to-end encrypts all your communication including messages, voice calls, group chats, files and even status messages. Only the intended recipient, and nobody else can read your messages.
  • No Ad
  • No Phone Number Required
  • GDPR-complaint

Signal

Signal is an Open Source project supported by grants and donations, Signal can put users first. There are no ads, no affiliate marketers, no creepy tracking. Just open technology for a fast, simple, and secure messaging experience. The way it should be.

Need phone number to register.

Telegram

Telegram is a messaging app with a focus on speed and security, it’s super-fast, simple and free. You can use Telegram on all your devices at the same time — your messages sync seamlessly across any number of your phones, tablets or computers.

With Telegram, you can send messages, photos, videos and files of any type (doc, zip, mp3, etc), as well as create groups for up to 200,000 people or channels for broadcasting to unlimited audiences. You can write to your phone contacts and find people by their usernames. As a result, Telegram is like SMS and email combined — and can take care of all your personal or business messaging needs. In addition to this, it support end-to-end encrypted voice calls.

Cons: Need phone number to register.

WhatsApp

Cons: Need phone number to register and want to sync your phone book to WhatsApp server. Please note Facebook own WhatsApp and Facebook have history does not do a good job on protect user privacy. There is report about Facebook expose millions of its users phone number online.

Hundreds of millions of phone numbers linked to Facebook accounts have been found online.

The exposed server contained more than 419 million records over several databases on users across geographies, including 133 million records on U.S.-based Facebook users, 18 million records of users in the U.K., and another with more than 50 million records on users in Vietnam.

Some of the records also had the user’s name, gender and location by country.

https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/04/facebook-phone-numbers-exposed/

If you want to keep your privacy, you should avoid use app need your phone book permission and sync your phone book online.

See also: